Beyond Major Urban Centers: How VLMA Aims to Make Lifestyle Medicine Professional Learning More Accessible in Viet Nam
LIFESTYLE MEDICINE IN VIET NAMHEALTH EQUITY & PLANETARY HEALTH
Beyond Major Urban Centers: How VLMA Aims to Make Lifestyle Medicine Professional Learning More Accessible in Viet Nam
Primary category: Lifestyle Medicine in Viet Nam
Secondary category: Health Equity & Planetary Health
Article type: VLMA Perspective
Last reviewed: October 22, 2026
An educational opportunity can be available online and still be difficult for someone to access.
A healthcare professional may find a useful course but be unable to attend because of clinical responsibilities. Another may have time to study but limited access to suitable materials. Someone else may register for an international webinar, only to discover that the language, technology, or examples make meaningful participation difficult.
These challenges are not always about motivation. They often reflect the conditions in which healthcare professionals work and learn.
Professional education is important to the development of evidence-based Lifestyle Medicine. Healthcare professionals need opportunities to understand scientific advances, examine clinical recommendations, and consider how relevant knowledge relates to their responsibilities.
Yet access to these opportunities can be influenced by time, cost, workplace support, technology, language, geographical location, and the relevance of the material to a person's professional role.
The Vietnam Lifestyle Medicine Alliance (VLMA) aims to support professional learning that is scientifically credible and relevant to healthcare practice in Viet Nam.
Our goal is not simply to organize more educational events or increase the number of participants. We are interested in how learning opportunities can become more useful and accessible to healthcare professionals working in different circumstances.
Access means more than being able to register for a course or open a website. It also involves having a realistic opportunity to participate, understand the information, ask questions when needed, and develop knowledge relevant to one's professional responsibilities.
As VLMA develops its educational activities, these considerations should help inform how learning opportunities are planned, delivered, and evaluated.
This article presents our perspective on making Lifestyle Medicine professional learning more accessible. It does not imply that VLMA has already established a nationwide training network, implemented a formal educational access program, or demonstrated improvements in educational equity or patient outcomes.
Access to Professional Learning Is About More Than Geography
Major urban centers often bring together universities, specialist hospitals, research institutions, and professional organizations. These environments can create valuable opportunities for academic exchange, continuing education, and professional networking.
However, activities concentrated in major cities may be less convenient for healthcare professionals working elsewhere. Travel can involve expenses, time away from work, and arrangements that are difficult to accommodate alongside clinical and personal responsibilities.
Geographical distance is only one part of the issue.
A healthcare professional working in a large hospital in Ho Chi Minh City or Ha Noi may also find it difficult to attend educational activities because of shift work, workload, or staffing demands.
Meanwhile, someone working outside a major urban center may have reliable internet access, institutional support, and opportunities to participate in selected online learning activities.
These examples show why educational access should not be understood through a simple urban-versus-rural distinction. Different professionals and organizations may encounter different combinations of barriers.
The World Health Organization's December 2025 report, Primary Health Care in Viet Nam: A Review of the Commune Health System, provides important context for the development of healthcare services in Viet Nam.
The report examines service delivery, financing, and governance at the commune health system level, with the aim of supporting stronger and more equitable primary healthcare.
However, it is not a nationwide assessment of access to Lifestyle Medicine professional education.
VLMA does not currently have representative national data showing how Lifestyle Medicine learning opportunities are distributed among healthcare professionals across Viet Nam.
We should therefore avoid claiming that particular geographical areas experience specific levels of educational disadvantage without suitable supporting evidence.
What we can recognize is that healthcare professionals work under different circumstances, and those circumstances matter when educational opportunities are developed.
Making professional learning more accessible begins with understanding these differences rather than assuming that one delivery model will suit everyone.
Finding Time to Learn
One of the most practical barriers to continuing professional education is finding time to participate.
Healthcare professionals may need to balance patient care, administrative responsibilities, staffing demands, family commitments, and other obligations. Even when an educational activity is relevant and affordable, participation may be difficult.
A webinar scheduled during working hours may be inaccessible to someone who cannot leave clinical duties. An evening session may suit some participants but be inconvenient for those working night shifts or managing caregiving responsibilities. Weekend programs may avoid certain scheduling conflicts while creating others.
These considerations matter because meaningful learning often requires more time than the advertised duration of an activity.
Participants may need to review background materials, prepare questions, complete assessments, or revisit important information afterward. A one-hour lecture may therefore involve more than one hour of learning-related activity.
International research has identified workload and limited protected learning time as recurring barriers to continuing professional development.
A rapid scoping review by Merry and colleagues, published in BMC Medical Education in 2023, examined the development, implementation, evaluation, and sustainability of continuing professional development systems in low- and lower-middle-income countries.
The review identified challenges involving time, workforce availability, costs, institutional support, and access to suitable educational opportunities.
These findings should not be treated as a direct measurement of the situation in Viet Nam. They do, however, offer useful considerations for educational planning.
For VLMA, learning activities should be designed with realistic expectations about participants' available time.
Clearly defined objectives, focused learning materials, advance access to selected resources, or opportunities to revisit content may be useful in appropriate circumstances.
However, shorter is not always better. Some subjects require extended discussion, supervised practice, or additional preparation. Reducing the duration of an activity should not mean removing the elements necessary to achieve its educational purpose.
The aim should be to make good use of participants' available time while preserving the quality of learning.
The Real Cost of Professional Education
The registration fee is only one part of the cost of professional learning.
An activity may be offered without charge but still require internet access, suitable devices, transportation, accommodation, or time away from paid work. For some participants, these indirect costs may be more significant than the advertised price.
International conferences and specialized programs can provide valuable opportunities for learning and professional exchange. Their costs, however, may make participation difficult for some individuals or organizations.
Even domestic activities may involve expenses that employers or individual healthcare professionals cannot easily support.
For VLMA, affordability should therefore be considered more broadly than whether an activity is free or paid.
A free resource requiring substantial data usage, specialized software, or repeated attendance at inconvenient times may remain difficult to access.
Conversely, a reasonably priced educational activity that provides appropriate teaching, interaction, and support may offer value for participants who can afford it.
No single pricing model guarantees equitable access.
Decisions about fees, sponsorship, institutional support, or other arrangements should consider the actual costs of providing an activity and the circumstances of its intended audience.
Where financially and operationally feasible, making selected evidence summaries or introductory resources publicly accessible may help reduce certain barriers.
Other activities may require resources for qualified educators, preparation, educational review, technical support, and evaluation.
A sustainable approach should recognize these costs transparently rather than promise that all professional learning can be provided without charge.
The objective is to make educational opportunities more accessible while maintaining the resources needed to deliver them responsibly.
Digital Education Can Expand Opportunities, but It Cannot Solve Every Problem
Digital technology has changed how healthcare professionals access educational information.
Recorded lectures, online reading materials, virtual discussions, and other digital formats can reduce some limitations associated with travel and fixed physical locations. They may also allow professionals to access selected resources at times that better fit their responsibilities.
However, digital availability should not be confused with meaningful access.
Someone may receive a webinar invitation but struggle to join because of unreliable connectivity, unfamiliar software, or device limitations.
A participant using a smartphone may be able to watch a presentation but find it difficult to read complex tables or detailed scientific figures. A recorded lecture may be convenient to access while offering little opportunity to clarify misunderstandings or ask questions.
The World Health Organization addressed these issues in its 2020 publication Digital Education for Building Health Workforce Capacity.
WHO recognized the potential of digital education to support health workforce development, including by expanding opportunities for professionals working in remote settings.
However, the report also emphasized that educational outcomes vary according to learning objectives, technology, instructional methods, assessment, professional discipline, and implementation conditions.
The quality and generalizability of the available evidence were identified as important limitations. WHO also highlighted the digital divide as a potential barrier to equitable participation.
Its 2019 guideline, Recommendations on Digital Interventions for Health System Strengthening, provides a related principle.
Recommendation 10 specifically addresses the provision of training and educational content through mobile devices for health workers who have completed their initial professional qualification, in the context of continuing education and in-service training.
WHO recommends this approach as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, traditional methods of delivering continuing professional education.
The recommendation has a defined scope. It should not be interpreted as a universal rule governing every form of online learning or all stages of health professions education.
Nevertheless, it reinforces an important consideration: digital learning should respond to educational needs rather than be treated as a complete substitute for other forms of professional development.
A systematic review by Aryee and colleagues, published in Human Resources for Health in 2024, examined 44 studies of electronic learning for healthcare professionals.
The review identified potential benefits across several approaches, including asynchronous, synchronous, blended, and self-directed learning. It also reported barriers involving workload, limited technical skills, device availability, internet access, organizational support, and personal responsibilities.
More recently, a systematic review by Dentice and colleagues, published in Nurse Education in Practice in 2026, examined 17 studies from 16 countries concerning electronic learning in continuing healthcare education.
The authors reported encouraging findings related to knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and selected skills.
However, evidence of sustained changes in professional practice was less consistent. Only four included studies examined patient-related outcomes such as safety, quality of care, satisfaction, or infection, using different measures and follow-up periods.
Much of the available evidence also relied on self-reported outcomes.
These findings support a balanced conclusion. Digital education can be useful, but its effectiveness depends on how it is designed, delivered, supported, and evaluated.
For VLMA, organizing a webinar or uploading a recording should not automatically be regarded as evidence that educational access, professional capability, or healthcare quality has improved.
The more important question is whether the intended learners can meaningfully use the opportunity.
Choosing Learning Formats That Work
Educational access is influenced by the way learning is delivered.
A live online discussion can allow participants to ask questions and hear different professional perspectives. However, it requires attendance at a particular time and usually depends on reliable connectivity.
Recorded materials offer more scheduling flexibility. Participants may be able to pause a presentation, review complex explanations, or return to an important topic. Yet recordings may provide limited opportunities for interaction or clarification.
Written evidence summaries can sometimes be easier to access and revisit than lengthy videos. They may help readers focus on a specific scientific question without reviewing an entire course.
However, reading material alone may not be sufficient when the intended learning requires discussion, demonstration, or practical skills.
Blended learning, combining digital and in-person activities, may be suitable for selected educational objectives. It can also increase costs and organizational complexity.
There is no reason to assume that every learner needs the same format or that one combination is always superior.
The WHO Academy's Quality Standards, published in October 2025, emphasize evidence-based content, inclusive and accessible learning, appropriate instructional design, and assessment.
These standards were developed for WHO Academy learning activities. They are not mandatory requirements for VLMA, but their principles provide a useful reference.
The WHO Academy Annual Report 2025, published in October 2026, describes the Academy's expansion of online, blended, and in-person learning, including multilingual educational resources.
This international experience illustrates how different formats may contribute to a broader learning environment.
However, the growth of a learning platform, its course catalogue, or its registrations should not be treated as proof of improved professional competence or patient outcomes.
For VLMA, the educational objective and the intended audience should guide the choice of format.
Some topics may be addressed effectively through a carefully prepared article. Others may benefit from a recorded explanation, a live discussion, or an activity involving more direct interaction.
Where feasible, combining concise reading materials with opportunities for questions or follow-up discussion may help address different practical circumstances.
The aim is not simply to produce more digital content. It is to provide learning opportunities suited to the questions participants need to explore.
Making Educational Materials Easier to Access and Use
Accessibility should be considered when educational materials are developed, not only after they have been published.
A resource may be scientifically accurate but difficult to use because of its presentation.
A document may contain technical terms without adequate explanation. A video may move too quickly through complex information. A presentation may contain text that becomes unreadable on a small screen.
These problems can affect learners regardless of where they work.
For VLMA, accessible educational design could include clear organization, readable text, appropriately labeled figures, and explanations that distinguish the main scientific message from supporting details.
Technical accessibility also matters.
Depending on the format and available resources, consideration may be given to mobile-friendly materials, reasonable file sizes, captions, transcripts, accessible documents, and alternatives for important information presented only through audio or video.
These measures may support people with different learning needs, disabilities, or technology limitations.
However, accessibility should not be treated as a purely technical checklist.
A resource may be easy to open and navigate but still difficult to understand because it assumes too much prior knowledge. Likewise, adding captions to a poorly organized recording may improve one aspect of access without resolving problems with the educational content.
The technology and the teaching need to work together.
As VLMA develops more structured digital learning activities, it would be useful to consider how materials function on the devices and platforms likely to be used by the intended audience.
This does not mean the organization must immediately provide every possible format or accessibility feature. It means treating accessibility as a meaningful part of educational planning and making appropriate improvements within available resources and applicable requirements.
Language and Professional Relevance Matter
Lifestyle Medicine is an international field, and much of its scientific literature is published in English.
Access to international publications can help Vietnamese healthcare professionals remain connected with scientific developments. However, language can also create difficulties.
A healthcare professional may understand the general clinical subject but find it challenging to interpret unfamiliar terminology, complex research methods, or nuanced recommendations presented in English.
Direct translation does not always resolve these problems.
Some scientific terms require additional explanation. International educational examples may also assume professional roles, referral systems, or healthcare resources that differ from those available in Viet Nam.
For VLMA, an important educational objective is to preserve scientific meaning while making relevant knowledge easier to understand in the Vietnamese context.
This might involve explaining unfamiliar terminology, providing relevant local examples, or developing selected bilingual educational resources where appropriate and feasible.
However, translating an international resource does not automatically make it suitable for local use.
Translations and adaptations must respect scientific accuracy, copyright, licensing conditions, attribution requirements, and applicable professional obligations.
Language is also only one dimension of relevance.
Healthcare professionals may have different learning needs according to their qualifications, responsibilities, and work settings.
A physician examining the clinical implications of research may require a different educational approach from a nurse, pharmacist, rehabilitation professional, public health practitioner, or student exploring the same subject.
Some topics are suitable for multidisciplinary learning. Others require more specialized expertise or profession-specific objectives.
Making education accessible should therefore include identifying the intended audience and presenting information at an appropriate level.
It should not mean simplifying every topic until important scientific distinctions disappear. Nor should participation in a shared educational activity imply that all participants have the same clinical responsibilities.
For VLMA, professional relevance is an important part of meaningful access.
Healthcare Organizations Influence Learning Opportunities
Professional learning is not solely an individual responsibility.
Healthcare organizations influence whether staff have realistic opportunities to participate in education.
A healthcare professional may be highly motivated but unable to attend a course because staffing arrangements do not permit time away from clinical duties.
Another may complete an educational activity but have limited opportunities to discuss or apply what was learned because of organizational constraints.
These circumstances matter because learning does not occur separately from the working environment.
The 2023 review by Merry and colleagues identified organizational support among the factors influencing continuing professional development systems in lower-resource settings.
A scoping review by Al-Omary and colleagues, published in BMC Medical Education in 2024, examined healthcare professionals' experiences of applying learning from continuing professional development activities.
The review included 13 studies conducted across different healthcare settings and countries.
Reported barriers included limited time and workforce resources, while facilitators included relevant educational content, suitable learning arrangements, and opportunities for collaborative learning.
The authors also identified gaps in the evidence about how professional learning is transferred into routine practice.
These findings should not be treated as a direct description of Vietnamese healthcare organizations.
Nevertheless, they reinforce an important consideration: professional education may be more useful when learners receive appropriate support from the organizations in which they work.
That support can take different forms.
Some organizations may be able to provide dedicated learning time. Others may facilitate access to materials, encourage internal professional discussions, or collaborate with educational providers.
Not every institution has the same resources or flexibility.
For VLMA, institutional collaboration could offer opportunities to understand educational needs and consider formats appropriate to particular working conditions.
Any such collaboration would require clear responsibilities, suitable arrangements, and realistic expectations.
The intention should not be to assume that employers can provide unlimited time or resources. It should be to recognize that meaningful access is influenced by both individual opportunities and the environment in which professionals work.
Why Educational Access Matters for Health Equity
Professional education is relevant to health equity because healthcare workers contribute knowledge and services within the communities where they practice.
When relevant learning opportunities are difficult to access, professionals may have fewer chances to engage with updated evidence or participate in professional discussions.
Reducing avoidable educational barriers could support more inclusive professional development, particularly in healthcare settings with limited educational resources or fewer opportunities for specialist academic exchange.
However, the relationship between educational access and health outcomes must be understood carefully.
A healthcare professional attending a course does not, by itself, demonstrate improved clinical care. Making an educational resource available outside a major city does not establish that health disparities have been reduced.
Even when participants report better understanding, further evidence would be required to determine whether learning influences clinical practice or patient outcomes.
For VLMA, a realistic initial objective would be to consider how relevant professional learning opportunities can become more accessible to different groups of intended learners without compromising scientific or educational quality.
This could contribute to broader professional development, but the nature and extent of any subsequent impact would need to be evaluated.
Health equity is therefore relevant to our educational direction without becoming a claim of social or clinical impact that has not been demonstrated.
The underlying principle is that professional learning opportunities should take account of where and how people work, rather than assume that access is the same for everyone.
Moving toward that goal requires attention to practical barriers, institutional differences, and available resources.
Understanding Learners' Needs Before Expanding Activities
Educational organizations may sometimes assume they know what learners need.
A course may be developed because a topic is internationally popular, a speaker is available, or a particular delivery format is convenient.
These considerations may influence planning, but they do not establish whether an activity addresses a meaningful learning need.
For VLMA, appropriately gathered feedback from prospective learners could help identify what makes education useful or difficult to access.
Healthcare professionals may be able to explain which scientific topics they find challenging, what formats fit their schedules, or what practical problems arise when they try to participate.
Their perspectives may also reveal difficulties involving language, technology, institutional requirements, or the relevance of learning materials to their work.
Such feedback would need careful interpretation.
Comments from a small number of engaged professionals should not be assumed to represent all healthcare workers in Viet Nam.
Those who already participate in professional networks or have reliable internet access may be more visible in online feedback. People facing the greatest access difficulties may be less likely to respond.
Feedback should therefore help identify issues for consideration rather than automatically be presented as representative national evidence.
If VLMA develops structured feedback activities, their purpose and scope should be defined appropriately.
Any collection or processing of personal data must comply with applicable Vietnamese requirements, including the Law on Personal Data Protection No. 91/2025/QH15 and Decree No. 356/2025/ND-CP, both effective from January 1, 2026.
Where personal information is involved, an appropriate legal basis for processing, transparency, data minimization, security, and other applicable safeguards must be considered.
Educational feedback should not require unnecessary collection of identifiable clinical information or personal details unrelated to the learning purpose.
VLMA does not currently claim to have conducted a representative national assessment of Lifestyle Medicine educational access or professional learning needs.
Our intended approach is to remain attentive to these questions as the organization's educational activities develop.
Measuring Access Beyond Registration and Attendance
Educational organizations often report the number of participants, courses, webinars, or resources published.
These figures can describe activity and provide useful information about participation. However, they do not offer a complete picture of accessibility or educational value.
A publicly available article may receive many views without showing whether readers understood its central message.
An online event may attract registrations from several locations without revealing how many participants could join successfully, remain connected, or obtain clarification when needed.
Similarly, a person may attend a course but leave without understanding the main scientific concepts.
If VLMA develops activities intended to improve educational access, evaluation should reflect the particular objective of each activity.
For a publicly available evidence resource, relevant questions may concern whether intended readers can locate the material, understand its purpose, and identify the main message.
For an online discussion, it may be useful to examine whether participants could access the platform, follow the conversation, and ask questions.
For a structured learning activity, suitable assessment may provide information about selected knowledge outcomes.
These measures address different aspects of the learning experience and should not be treated as interchangeable.
It may also be helpful to distinguish different stages of access.
Someone may become aware of an educational opportunity but be unable to register. Another may register but be unable to attend. A participant may attend but struggle to engage, while someone who understands the material may still lack opportunities to apply that knowledge in their professional setting.
Recognizing these differences can help identify where barriers arise.
Information about participants' professional roles, organizational settings, or access difficulties may help explain limitations, provided that collecting and using such information is appropriate, necessary, and legally compliant.
The interpretation of findings matters as much as the measures themselves.
A small learning activity can provide useful information about its participants without establishing the situation across Viet Nam.
Participation from several provinces does not automatically demonstrate nationwide educational coverage.
Higher registration numbers do not necessarily mean greater equity if important groups continue to face barriers.
Likewise, improved understanding of a resource does not establish that professional behavior or patient outcomes have changed.
For VLMA, evaluation should help determine whether educational opportunities are becoming more understandable, relevant, and accessible to their intended audience.
It should not be used to make claims about national impact or clinical outcomes without supporting evidence.
What VLMA Could Realistically Develop
VLMA's Education platform identifies several possible formats for professional development, including workshops, webinars, evidence updates, case-based discussions, journal clubs, and institutional education.
Its Knowledge & Evidence resources also provide a publicly accessible foundation for professional learning.
These resources offer a starting point, but their availability should not be interpreted as evidence that VLMA operates a nationwide education network or has demonstrated improvements in educational access.
A responsible next step would be to develop activities that match the organization's expertise and resources.
One direction is to continue producing credible educational resources addressing questions relevant to Vietnamese healthcare professionals.
Selected topics may benefit from short online discussions, recorded explanations, or additional written materials, depending on the learning objective and available support.
Where appropriate, resources could be developed in Vietnamese or accompanied by explanations that help readers interpret international evidence within the Vietnamese healthcare context.
Institutional collaboration may also offer opportunities to identify learning needs and consider suitable formats for different professional groups.
However, activities should be selected carefully.
Not every topic requires an online course. Not every article needs a recorded lecture. Not every learning opportunity benefits from having a large audience.
Sometimes a carefully prepared evidence summary may be more useful than another general webinar. At other times, a live discussion may be needed to explore uncertainty or clarify professional questions.
The choice should follow the educational need.
VLMA should also consider whether it has sufficient capacity to support educational preparation, content review, technical delivery, communication, and proportionate evaluation.
Expanding the number of activities without adequate support could reduce their quality and usefulness.
At the current stage of development, gradual progress based on credible content, feasible delivery, and lessons from appropriate feedback is more realistic than promising rapid nationwide expansion.
The emphasis should be on meaningful learning opportunities rather than numerical growth alone.
Professional Education and Regulatory Boundaries in Viet Nam
Improving educational access does not remove the need to comply with professional and legal requirements.
In Viet Nam, informal professional knowledge exchange, structured training activities, recognized continuing medical education, and clinical practical training may involve different obligations.
The requirements depend on the nature of the activity, the organization responsible for it, the participants, and applicable legal and institutional arrangements.
The Law on Medical Examination and Treatment No. 15/2023/QH15, as amended, establishes professional requirements relevant to medical examination and treatment activities and continuing medical knowledge updating.
The Ministry of Health has also issued regulations and quality standards concerning continuing training for healthcare personnel.
On August 10, 2026, the Ministry issued Decision No. 2546/QD-BYT, establishing quality assurance standards for continuing training and continuing medical knowledge updating.
The standards address organizational responsibilities, educational programs, learning resources, educator qualifications, assessment, and quality assurance.
Their application must be considered according to the actual nature and regulatory status of the educational activity and provider.
Making a course available online does not independently establish that it qualifies for recognized continuing medical education credits.
Likewise, an article published on a professional website does not automatically constitute an accredited training program.
Where VLMA develops educational activities with universities, hospitals, or other eligible organizations, responsibilities for delivery, assessment, documentation, and any formal recognition should be agreed upon appropriately.
Certificates of Attendance or Completion, where lawfully and appropriately issued, should accurately describe what participants attended or completed.
They should not be represented as professional licenses, specialty qualifications, recognized continuing education credits, or International Board of Lifestyle Medicine certification unless the relevant conditions for that specific recognition have been fulfilled.
Access to Lifestyle Medicine education also does not authorize healthcare professionals to undertake clinical activities outside their lawful scope of practice.
VLMA is a physician-led professional platform operated by Vietnam Lifestyle Medicine Alliance Company Limited. It is not a healthcare service provider or medical licensing authority.
Its contribution to professional learning must remain within the organization's lawful scope and any applicable institutional arrangements.
Educational accessibility and professional accountability should be developed together.
Beyond Major Urban Centers: Our Commitment
The responsible development of evidence-based Lifestyle Medicine in Viet Nam requires more than producing scientific publications or organizing professional events.
Healthcare professionals also need realistic opportunities to engage with knowledge that is relevant to their work.
Those opportunities may be influenced by time, cost, technology, language, organizational support, and the suitability of educational content.
A resource being available does not necessarily mean it is accessible. Attendance does not automatically mean learning has occurred, and learning does not automatically demonstrate a change in professional practice.
For VLMA, these distinctions should guide how we think about educational development.
We do not want to measure progress only by the number of events organized, participants registered, or resources published.
Those figures may be useful, but they cannot fully describe whether educational opportunities are reaching the intended audience or meeting meaningful learning needs.
Our intention is to consider how reliable Lifestyle Medicine knowledge can become easier for healthcare professionals in different circumstances to access and use.
This may involve carefully prepared evidence resources, suitable digital formats, language support, institutional collaboration, and attention to the practical barriers learners encounter.
We recognize that this work requires expertise, resources, and ongoing improvement.
VLMA has not demonstrated that its educational activities have reduced disparities in professional learning across Viet Nam. Nor do we intend to replace established educational institutions or the regulatory systems governing professional training.
Our goal is to contribute within our capabilities by connecting credible scientific information with professional learning opportunities relevant to Vietnamese healthcare.
For VLMA, making Lifestyle Medicine education more accessible is not simply about reaching more people. It is about helping create meaningful opportunities for healthcare professionals to understand scientific evidence and develop relevant knowledge within the circumstances and responsibilities of their work.
That is one practical way we hope to support a more inclusive connection between scientific evidence, professional capability, and responsible Lifestyle Medicine practice in Viet Nam.
Selected References
Vietnam Lifestyle Medicine Alliance. Lifestyle Medicine Education and Professional Development. VLMA; 2026.
World Health Organization. Recommendations on Digital Interventions for Health System Strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. ISBN: 978-92-4-155050-5.
World Health Organization. Digital Education for Building Health Workforce Capacity. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. ISBN: 978-92-4-000047-6.
World Health Organization. WHO Academy Quality Standards: Leading Lifelong Learning for a Healthier World. Geneva: World Health Organization; October 7, 2025. WHO Reference Number: B09490.
World Health Organization. WHO Academy: Annual Report 2025. Geneva: World Health Organization; October 19, 2026. ISBN: 978-92-4-012373-1.
World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific. Primary Health Care in Viet Nam: A Review of the Commune Health System. Manila: World Health Organization; December 2025. ISBN: 978-92-9062-115-7.
Merry L, Castiglione SA, Rouleau G, et al. Continuing professional development (CPD) system development, implementation, evaluation and sustainability for healthcare professionals in low- and lower-middle-income countries: A rapid scoping review. BMC Medical Education. 2023;23:498. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04427-6.
Aryee GFB, Amoadu M, Obeng P, et al. Effectiveness of eLearning programme for capacity building of healthcare professionals: A systematic review. Human Resources for Health. 2024;22:60. doi:10.1186/s12960-024-00924-x.
Dentice S, Moreal C, Chiappinotto S, et al. Professional and patient care outcomes of e-learning in healthcare continuing education: A systematic review. Nurse Education in Practice. 2026;94:104866. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104866.
Al-Omary H, Soltani A, Stewart D, Nazar Z. Implementing learning into practice from continuous professional development activities: A scoping review of health professionals' views and experiences. BMC Medical Education. 2024;24:1031. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06016-7.
National Assembly of Viet Nam. Law on Medical Examination and Treatment No. 15/2023/QH15, as amended. Consolidated Text No. 26/VBHN-VPQH, February 26, 2026.
Ministry of Health of Viet Nam. Decision No. 2546/QD-BYT Issuing the Quality Assurance Standards for Continuing Training and Continuing Medical Knowledge Updating for Healthcare Personnel. August 10, 2026.
National Assembly of Viet Nam. Law on Personal Data Protection No. 91/2025/QH15. Effective January 1, 2026.
Government of Viet Nam. Decree No. 356/2025/ND-CP Detailing Certain Articles and Measures for Implementing the Law on Personal Data Protection. Effective January 1, 2026.
Editorial and Professional Scope Note
This article presents the organizational perspective and intended educational direction of the Vietnam Lifestyle Medicine Alliance as of October 2026. It is intended for professional information, education, and knowledge exchange. It does not constitute a clinical practice guideline, individualized medical advice, an accredited training program, a formal educational access policy, or an official regulatory interpretation.
Examples of educational barriers, learning formats, institutional collaboration, feedback, and possible future activities are illustrative unless explicitly identified as established VLMA practices. The article does not imply that VLMA has conducted a representative national assessment of educational access, established a nationwide training network, implemented a formal educational equity program, or demonstrated improvements in clinical practice or patient outcomes.
VLMA is a physician-led professional platform operated by Vietnam Lifestyle Medicine Alliance Company Limited. It is not a healthcare service provider or medical licensing authority. Participation in VLMA educational activities does not independently establish clinical competence, expand lawful scope of practice, confer professional licensure, or provide formally recognized continuing medical education credits or International Board of Lifestyle Medicine certification.
Any future educational activities involving formal training, institutional partnerships, participant assessment, personal data collection, certification, or recognized continuing education must comply with applicable Vietnamese legal, professional, educational, institutional, and data protection requirements.
Vietnam Lifestyle Medicine Alliance
Evidence-Based Lifestyle Medicine for Viet Nam.
Contact
contact@vlma.org
Saigon Paragon Building, No. 3 Nguyen Luong Bang Street, Tan My Ward, HCMC
+84 909 228 476
+84 84 9999 911
© 2025 - 2026. Vietnam Lifestyle Medicine Alliance. All rights reserved.
A physician-led professional platform advancing Lifestyle Medicine through education, collaboration, research, and responsible implementation.
VLMA is operated by Vietnam Lifestyle Medicine Alliance Company Limited, Enterprise Registration Number 0318902666.
VLMA is a Sister Organization of the Lifestyle Medicine Global Alliance and a Member Organization of the Planetary Health Alliance.
VLMA is not a medical service provider and does not issue medical licenses or IBLM certification.
