Stress Management in Lifestyle Medicine in Viet Nam: From Everyday Stress to Evidence-Based Care and Mental Health Referral

Stress Management in Lifestyle Medicine in Viet Nam: From Everyday Stress to Evidence-Based Care and Mental Health Referral

Last reviewed: September 2026

Stress is part of ordinary life. A difficult conversation, a demanding deadline, financial uncertainty, caregiving responsibilities, illness, academic pressure or a major life transition can all produce stress. Experiencing stress does not automatically mean that someone has a mental disorder, and the goal of Lifestyle Medicine should not be to eliminate every uncomfortable emotion.

The World Health Organization defines stress as a state of worry or mental tension caused by a difficult situation and describes it as a natural human response to challenges and threats. Some stress can help people respond to everyday demands, while excessive or prolonged stress can affect physical and mental health, sleep, concentration, relationships and daily functioning.

This distinction matters because “stress management” is sometimes presented too casually. Meditation, relaxation, physical activity or taking time away from work may help some people, but these approaches are not substitutes for appropriate assessment and treatment when someone is experiencing clinically significant anxiety, depression, trauma-related symptoms, suicidal risk or another mental health condition.

The 2025 Lifestyle Medicine Core Competencies recognize this broader responsibility. They include assessment for stress, depression and anxiety; understanding the relationship between emotional and physical health; evidence-based and patient-centered approaches to mental and emotional health; resilience-building strategies; appraisal of mindfulness-based stress reduction; and knowing when referral to mental health professionals is appropriate.

Stress management in Lifestyle Medicine is therefore best understood as a continuum. At one end are healthy coping, prevention and self-management. At the other are formal mental health assessment and treatment when symptoms, functional impairment or safety concerns indicate that a higher level of care is needed.

Stress is a response, not a diagnosis

Stress, anxiety, depression and burnout are often used interchangeably in everyday conversation, but they are not the same thing. Stress describes a response to demands or difficult circumstances. Someone under significant work pressure may feel tense, irritable, tired or distracted while still being able to function without having a mental disorder.

Anxiety can also be a normal human emotion. An anxiety disorder, however, involves symptoms that are more persistent or excessive and interfere significantly with functioning or cause substantial distress. Depression is likewise different from ordinary sadness or temporary low mood.

The World Health Organization's current definition of a mental disorder emphasizes a clinically significant disturbance in cognition, emotional regulation or behavior, usually associated with distress or impairment in important areas of functioning. Its fact sheet was most recently updated in September 2026.

This distinction matters clinically because the intervention changes with the problem. Someone going through a temporary stressful period may benefit from practical problem solving, sleep support, physical activity, social support or adjustments to work and daily routines. Someone with persistent depressive symptoms, an anxiety disorder or another mental health condition may require structured psychological treatment, medical evaluation or specialist care.

Burnout is not simply another word for stress

Burnout also deserves clarification because the term is now used very broadly. Under the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision, burnout is classified as an occupational phenomenon, not as a medical condition. It results from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed and is characterized by exhaustion, increased mental distance or cynicism toward work, and reduced professional efficacy. The term is specifically intended for the occupational context.

This does not make burnout unimportant. Workplace stress can have major effects on well-being, functioning and workforce sustainability. However, describing someone as “burned out” should not prevent appropriate consideration of depression, anxiety, insomnia, substance use or other conditions when the clinical picture suggests them.

It also changes where responsibility lies. If excessive workload, understaffing, low job control, harassment, unsafe working conditions or organizational culture is driving distress, the solution cannot rest entirely on asking employees to become more resilient. Breathing or relaxation exercises may help someone manage an acute stress response, but they cannot correct an unsafe workplace or harmful organizational conditions.

Stress management should start with understanding what is happening

A useful stress conversation begins with context rather than immediately recommending a technique. What is creating the stress? How long has it been present? Is the stressor temporary or ongoing? How is the person sleeping? Has appetite changed? Can they continue working, studying, caring for themselves and maintaining important relationships? Are alcohol, tobacco or other substances being used to cope? Are symptoms improving, remaining stable or getting worse?

The person's own priorities also matter. A new parent experiencing sleep deprivation, a physician working repeated night shifts, a student facing examination pressure and someone caring for a parent with dementia may all say that they are “stressed,” but the causes and appropriate responses may be very different.

Lifestyle Medicine can add value when it connects emotional health with the person's wider life. Sleep, physical activity, social relationships, work, nutrition, substance use, financial pressures and the physical environment can interact with stress and with one another.

The 2025 Lifestyle Medicine Core Competencies also explicitly require interventions to consider social determinants of health rather than assuming that health behaviors occur independently of social and economic circumstances. Stress management should follow the same principle.

Not every stressor can be solved by changing the individual

Some sources of stress are modifiable through individual action. Setting boundaries, improving routines, addressing sleep, developing healthier coping strategies or asking for help may make an important difference.

Other stressors are structural. A worker may face excessive workload and little control over their schedule. A caregiver may have no practical respite. A household may face sustained financial pressure. A student may be experiencing bullying. A person may live with family conflict or an unsafe relationship. Long commuting times, noise, heat, overcrowding and other environmental conditions can also affect well-being.

The World Health Organization recommends that employers address psychosocial risks through organizational interventions that directly improve working conditions and environments. Excessive workloads, understaffing, low job control, long or inflexible hours, poor organizational culture, violence, harassment and job insecurity are among the recognized risks to mental health at work.

Good stress management therefore asks two questions at the same time: what can the individual realistically change, and what needs to change in the environment around them?

Stress interacts with the other Lifestyle Medicine pillars

Stress rarely exists independently of other health behaviors. It can disrupt sleep, reduce physical activity, change eating patterns, increase tobacco or alcohol use, reduce social contact and make adherence to medical treatment more difficult. These changes may then worsen physical and emotional well-being and create a reinforcing cycle.

Sleep is a particularly common example. Stress can make it difficult to fall asleep or stay asleep, while insufficient sleep can increase fatigue, irritability and difficulty coping with everyday demands. Persistent insomnia may require more than general sleep-hygiene advice, particularly when symptoms suggest an underlying sleep disorder, depression, anxiety or another medical problem.

Physical activity can also support mental well-being. The World Health Organization recognizes mental health benefits of regular physical activity, but the strength of evidence depends on the clinical question. For adults with generalized anxiety disorder or panic disorder, structured physical exercise should be considered, but this is a conditional recommendation based on very low-certainty evidence.

This distinction is useful. Walking, resistance exercise, sport or other movement may be valuable parts of a person's stress-management plan without being presented as substitutes for evidence-based psychological or psychiatric treatment when those are needed.

Not all “stress-management” interventions have the same level of evidence

Breathing exercises, progressive relaxation, mindfulness and related techniques are widely promoted for stress. Some people find them practical and helpful, particularly when the approach fits their preferences and circumstances. However, these interventions should not be presented as universally effective or as equivalent to formal psychological treatment.

For adults with generalized anxiety disorder or panic disorder, the World Health Organization states that relaxation and/or mindfulness training should be considered. This is a conditional recommendation supported by low-certainty evidence.

By comparison, brief structured psychological interventions based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles should be offered for these conditions. That recommendation is strong and supported by moderate-certainty evidence.

The distinction is important for Lifestyle Medicine. A person experiencing everyday stress may reasonably use relaxation or mindfulness as self-management tools. Someone with a clinically significant anxiety disorder should not be told that meditation alone is equivalent to appropriate psychological treatment.

The relevant question is not whether mindfulness is “good” or “bad.” It is whether the intervention matches the problem, the person's needs and the strength of the available evidence.

Psychological self-help is becoming an increasingly important part of evidence-based care

An important development in 2026 is the World Health Organization's new implementation guidance on psychological self-help.

In June 2026, the World Health Organization published Psychological Self-Help Interventions: Delivering Self-Help for Individuals, which provides guidance for structured interventions delivered through digital platforms, printed materials or video, either independently or with brief support. The manual includes two World Health Organization interventions, Step-by-Step and Doing What Matters in Times of Stress, both of which have demonstrated effectiveness in multiple randomized controlled trials.

Doing What Matters in Times of Stress is particularly relevant to Lifestyle Medicine because it teaches practical skills such as grounding, unhooking from difficult thoughts, acting on personal values, making room for difficult emotions and engaging with kindness. These are structured psychological self-help skills rather than generic instructions to “think positively.”

Scalable self-help creates opportunities for primary care, workplaces, universities and community settings, particularly where specialist resources are limited. But self-help should not become a way of leaving people with significant mental health needs to manage alone.

A stepped approach is more appropriate. Lower-intensity support can be used when it matches the person's needs, with monitoring and access to more intensive or specialist care when symptoms, impairment or risk require it. World Health Organization guidance also recognizes that brief psychological interventions may be delivered through different formats, including individual, group, digital, guided, unguided, specialist and appropriately supported non-specialist models.

Social connection is part of coping with stress

People rarely cope with stress entirely on their own. Family, friends, colleagues, peers and communities can provide emotional support, practical assistance, perspective and a sense of belonging.

The quality of these relationships matters as much as simply having people nearby. Living in a large household does not guarantee emotional support, just as living alone does not automatically mean that someone is lonely.

This is particularly relevant in Viet Nam, where family relationships can be an important source of support but can also involve caregiving burdens, obligations or conflict. Lifestyle Medicine should therefore explore what support is actually available rather than assuming that the presence of family means that social needs are being met.

For some people, strengthening existing relationships may be helpful. For others, peer support or community activities may be useful, and where suitable referral pathways exist, social-prescribing approaches may also have a role. These options should remain person-centered, and advice to “connect more” is clearly inappropriate when the relationship or environment itself involves violence, coercion or abuse.

Viet Nam should be cautious with claims about how many people are “stressed”

Online searches about stress in Viet Nam often return striking percentages drawn from workplace surveys, student studies, online questionnaires or research involving particular professional groups. These studies may be valuable for the populations they actually examined, but they should not automatically be presented as national prevalence estimates.

In the World Health Organization's Mental Health Atlas 2024 country profile, Viet Nam reported that no national mental health survey had been conducted within the previous ten years.

This is particularly important because “stress” itself is not one standardized diagnosis. Different studies may measure perceived stress, psychological distress, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, burnout or diagnosed mental disorders and then describe these findings using the same everyday word.

For an evidence-based Lifestyle Medicine resource, the stronger approach is therefore to identify precisely what was measured, in which population, at what time and using which method. Where nationally representative data are not available, it is better to acknowledge the limitation than to turn a local or occupational survey into a statistic about the entire Vietnamese population.

Viet Nam's 2026 prevention framework creates a more structured pathway for mental health support

The legal and professional context changed substantially in 2026.

The Law on Disease Prevention No. 114/2025/QH15, effective from July 1, 2026, expressly covers prevention of mental disorders. It defines mental health as a healthy mental state that enables people to cope with stresses in life, recognize their abilities, learn and work effectively, and contribute to the community. Article 31 recognizes biological, genetic, psychological and social risk factors and provides for early identification, management, monitoring and appropriate psychological and social support for people at risk.

The law also places prevention in families, educational institutions and workplaces, with priority populations including students, workers, pregnant women, mothers with children under 24 months, children, older adults, people with disabilities and people who have experienced psychological trauma following incidents or disasters.

The framework was developed further through Government Decree No. 165/2026/NĐ-CP, also effective from July 1, 2026. The Decree organizes community prevention around mental health education and communication, early detection, management, monitoring and psychological and social support. It specifically calls for living, learning and working environments that support mental health and for skills that help people manage psychological stress.

Importantly, Decree No. 165/2026/NĐ-CP also sets conditions for facilities providing counseling and psychological support to people identified as being at risk of mental disorder under this statutory pathway. These include having at least one licensed healthcare practitioner trained in psychiatry or clinical psychology in accordance with Ministry of Health guidance, providing adequate privacy and having appropriate counseling materials and facilities.

On the same day the law took effect, the Ministry of Health issued Decision No. 1981/QĐ-BYT, introducing the Guidance on Prevention of Mental Disorders and Management, Health Care and Social Care for People with Mental Disorders in the Community. The guidance provides a structured pathway for education, development of supportive living, working and learning environments, early detection of people at risk, psychological and social support, monitoring and referral.

This is particularly relevant to Lifestyle Medicine because Viet Nam's current prevention framework now explicitly recognizes basic stress-management skills, healthy lifestyles, social support and environmental factors while also creating escalation pathways when risk becomes greater.

Viet Nam's new guidance also makes safety escalation more explicit

Decision No. 1981/QĐ-BYT goes beyond general mental health promotion. It introduces a five-step process for early identification and response to people at risk of mental disorders and incorporates standardized psychological screening tools where appropriate, including tools for depression, anxiety, insomnia, trauma-related symptoms and suicide risk.

The safety pathway is particularly important. When recent suicidal or self-harming thoughts or behavior, severe agitation or another emergency sign is identified, the guidance states that screening should not simply continue as usual. Safety takes priority, the responsible professional should be informed, family or other support may be contacted when appropriate, and the person should be transferred for suitable emergency mental health care.

This reinforces an important principle for Lifestyle Medicine. A routine stress-management conversation has a limit. Urgent mental health risk requires an urgent clinical pathway.

The Ministry's guidance also includes basic self-care approaches for people at risk, such as appropriate rest, slow breathing, relaxation, scheduling, breaking tasks into manageable steps, speaking with a trusted person and seeking help when needed. These approaches sit within a broader system that includes follow-up and escalation rather than being presented as stand-alone solutions.

Stress management is not the same as clinical psychological treatment

The 2026 prevention framework makes it important not to create an artificial binary in which every mental health-related activity is either ordinary wellness advice or specialist psychotherapy.

General mental health education, stress-management education, healthy lifestyle promotion and some forms of community-based psychological and social support should not automatically be equated with clinical psychology practice. Viet Nam's new prevention framework expressly includes mental health education, stress-management skills and psychological and social support in community prevention.

However, when activities involve clinical assessment, diagnosis or psychological treatment of a mental disorder, the medical examination and treatment framework and the authorized professional scope of the practitioner apply.

The current Law on Medical Examination and Treatment, together with Ministry of Health regulations, recognizes clinical psychology as a regulated professional title. Circular No. 32/2023/TT-BYT states that clinical psychology practice includes continuous and comprehensive cognitive, behavioral, emotional and psychosocial care, including assessment of mental disorders and the indication, design and implementation of psychological interventions in medical examination and treatment facilities.

Circular No. 25/2026/TT-BYT, issued on June 30, 2026 and effective from August 15, 2026, subsequently amended selected provisions of Circular No. 32/2023/TT-BYT and other Ministry of Health regulations. The current professional framework therefore needs to be read as amended rather than relying solely on the original 2023 Circular.

The practical distinction depends on what is actually being done. Teaching a healthy adult a general breathing exercise is different from assessing whether someone has panic disorder. Supporting implementation of an agreed lifestyle plan is different from providing psychological treatment for major depression. An international Lifestyle Medicine, mindfulness, wellness or health-coaching certificate may demonstrate additional education, but it does not by itself create a Vietnamese clinical psychology license or expand the holder's legally authorized clinical scope.

Mental health care is a team responsibility

Professional boundaries should not be interpreted to mean that every conversation about emotional health must immediately be transferred away from the rest of healthcare.

Primary care physicians and other appropriately licensed clinicians may identify symptoms, evaluate possible medical contributors, consider medication effects, assess clinical risk and coordinate care within their authorized scope. Nurses can contribute to education, monitoring, continuity and support. Clinical psychologists may provide psychological assessment and interventions within their professional scope.

Psychiatric assessment or consultation may be indicated when diagnostic complexity, severe mental illness, medication management or higher clinical risk requires specialist input. Community health services and social services may also contribute to monitoring, family support and addressing practical or social needs within their respective roles.

The World Health Organization's Mental Health Gap Action Programme was developed specifically to strengthen evidence-based mental health care in non-specialist settings while maintaining appropriate referral and escalation. Its current guidance recognizes an important role for trained non-specialist providers, especially where specialist resources are limited.

Lifestyle Medicine fits naturally within this collaborative model. It should strengthen the interface between physical health, behavior and emotional health rather than create a parallel mental health profession.

When should stress lead to mental health referral?

There is no single symptom or questionnaire score that determines referral for every person. Context, duration, severity, functional impairment and risk all matter.

More formal assessment becomes increasingly important when distress is persistent or worsening, significantly interferes with work, study, self-care or relationships, or when symptoms suggest depression, an anxiety disorder, trauma-related disorder, eating disorder, substance use disorder or another mental health condition. Referral is also appropriate when reasonable lower-intensity support has not helped or when the practitioner is moving beyond their training, competence or authorized scope.

Urgent pathways are different. Suicidal or serious self-harm risk, psychosis, severe agitation, acute confusion, inability to maintain basic safety or other serious mental health concerns require timely clinical assessment and, where appropriate, emergency care. Viet Nam's 2026 Ministry of Health community mental health guidance explicitly establishes escalation when recent suicide or self-harm risk or other emergency signs are identified.

The purpose of referral is not to turn ordinary stress into disease. It is to recognize when the problem has moved beyond what routine stress-management support can safely address.

Workplaces need to address causes of stress, not only teach resilience

Work is a major part of adult life, and organizational conditions can strongly affect mental health. This is particularly relevant in settings characterized by long working hours, high workload, limited autonomy, understaffing or repeated exposure to emotionally difficult situations.

The World Health Organization recommends organizational interventions that assess and modify workplace psychosocial risks, alongside mental health literacy, manager training and individual interventions to help workers manage stress.

A workplace may reasonably offer physical activity opportunities, stress-management education or mindfulness programs. These may help individuals. But if excessive workload, unpredictable schedules, violence, bullying or poor management remain unchanged, individual-level interventions alone are unlikely to address the main problem.

A responsible workplace approach should therefore support employees' coping skills while also reducing avoidable organizational sources of harm. Lifestyle Medicine should not become a mechanism for transferring responsibility for unhealthy working conditions entirely onto the worker.

A practical pathway for stress-related care

A practical Lifestyle Medicine approach can begin by clarifying what the person means when they say they are stressed. The professional can explore the stressors involved, duration, impact on daily functioning, sleep, physical activity, relationships, substance use and current coping strategies, while also considering social and environmental factors that may be maintaining the problem.

When the presentation is consistent with everyday stress and no major clinical concern is evident, an individualized plan might include sleep support, physical activity, relaxation or mindfulness practices, structured psychological self-help, social connection, problem solving and appropriate changes to the environment or daily routine. The plan should be realistic and should not attempt to change every Lifestyle Medicine pillar at once.

Follow-up is important because the person's situation may improve, remain unchanged or worsen. A self-management plan should not become an endpoint if distress is increasing, daily functioning is deteriorating or new clinical concerns emerge.

A practical pathway can therefore be summarized as understand the stressor and its impact → identify modifiable lifestyle, social and environmental contributors → screen or assess further when appropriate → agree on a realistic evidence-based plan → follow up → escalate or refer when symptoms, impairment or risk indicate that a different level of care is needed.

Measure more than whether someone says they feel less stressed

Stress-management programs are often evaluated informally. Someone attends a workshop, downloads an application or learns a relaxation exercise, and improvement is assumed.

A stronger approach asks what actually changed. Depending on the purpose of the intervention, relevant outcomes might include perceived stress, sleep, ability to work or study, physical activity, social participation, use of alcohol or tobacco as coping strategies, quality of life or clinically relevant symptoms.

Validated questionnaires may be useful in appropriate settings, but they should be used with an understanding of what they measure and what they do not. A score is not the same as a complete clinical assessment, and normal fluctuations in emotion should not be converted unnecessarily into disease labels.

Patient experience also matters. Did the intervention fit the person's circumstances and priorities? Was it manageable? Did it create additional burden? Were the most important sources of stress actually addressed?

Healthcare services, educational institutions and workplaces can also evaluate implementation. Are people with significant distress recognized? Are referral and escalation pathways available? Does follow-up occur? Are environmental and organizational stressors being addressed as well as individual coping skills?

Measurement should improve care, not turn ordinary human emotions into a permanent performance metric.

What does this mean for Lifestyle Medicine in Viet Nam?

Viet Nam does not need a Lifestyle Medicine model that turns “manage stress” into another generic instruction alongside “eat better” and “exercise more.”

The stronger opportunity is to build a continuum of support. At one end are health promotion, healthy coping, sleep, physical activity, social connection and evidence-based self-help. In the middle are structured assessment, psychological and social support and collaborative care. At the other end are formal psychological or psychiatric assessment and treatment when symptoms, impairment or risk require them.

The timing is important. Viet Nam's 2026 framework now explicitly connects prevention of mental disorders with healthy lifestyles, stress-management skills, supportive environments, early detection, psychological and social support, families, educational settings, workplaces and community care.

At the same time, the medical examination and treatment framework continues to define professional scope for clinical care. These two systems should be seen as complementary rather than contradictory. Mental health promotion and prevention can occur earlier and more broadly, while people who need diagnosis or treatment should be connected to appropriately qualified clinical care.

Lifestyle Medicine can contribute by helping people identify modifiable factors, strengthen daily routines, improve sleep and physical activity, develop healthier coping strategies, reduce harmful substance use, strengthen social support and address environmental barriers where possible. Its role is not to replace psychiatry or clinical psychology.

Managing stress is important. Knowing when stress management is not enough is equally important.

Stress is part of being human. Lifestyle Medicine can help people respond to it more effectively through evidence-based self-management, healthier daily behaviors, supportive relationships and improvements in the environments in which they live and work.

But “stress management” should not become a catch-all explanation for every form of emotional distress. Someone experiencing ordinary stress may need practical support and better coping tools. Someone with clinically significant anxiety, depression, trauma-related symptoms or another mental health condition may require formal treatment. A workplace with harmful psychosocial conditions may need organizational change rather than another resilience program.

Good Lifestyle Medicine therefore asks more than how a person can relax. It asks what is creating the stress, how the person is functioning, what can realistically change, which interventions are supported by evidence, whether safety concerns are present and whether another level of care is needed.

That is the difference between giving stress-management advice and integrating emotional health responsibly into Lifestyle Medicine.

References

1. Rea BL, Cheema S, Lanza S, et al. Lifestyle Medicine Core Competencies: 2025 Update. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2026;20(3):443–451. First published online October 28, 2025. doi:10.1177/15598276251379821.

2. World Health Organization. Stress. Questions and Answers. Updated March 30, 2026.

3. World Health Organization. Mental Disorders. Fact sheet. Updated September 11, 2026.

4. World Health Organization. Psychological Self-Help Interventions: Delivering Self-Help for Individuals, Featuring Step-by-Step and Doing What Matters in Times of Stress. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2026.

5. World Health Organization. Doing What Matters in Times of Stress: An Illustrated Guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.

6. World Health Organization. Mental Health Gap Action Programme Guideline for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.

7. World Health Organization. Stress Management Techniques for Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Panic Disorder. Mental Health Gap Action Programme evidence centre; 2023 recommendation.

8. World Health Organization. Brief Structured Psychological Interventions for Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Panic Disorder. Mental Health Gap Action Programme evidence centre; 2023 recommendation.

9. World Health Organization. Structured Physical Exercise for Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Panic Disorder. Mental Health Gap Action Programme evidence centre; 2023 recommendation.

10. World Health Organization. Mental Health Atlas 2024: Country Profile, Viet Nam. Geneva: World Health Organization; published 2025.

11. World Health Organization. Mental Health at Work. Fact sheet. September 2, 2024.

12. World Health Organization. Burn-out an Occupational Phenomenon. International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision guidance.

13. National Assembly of Viet Nam. Law on Disease Prevention No. 114/2025/QH15, dated December 10, 2025, effective July 1, 2026.

14. Government of Viet Nam. Decree No. 165/2026/NĐ-CP, dated May 15, 2026, detailing and guiding implementation of selected provisions of the Law on Disease Prevention, effective July 1, 2026.

15. Ministry of Health of Viet Nam. Decision No. 1981/QĐ-BYT, dated July 1, 2026. Guidance on Prevention of Mental Disorders and Management, Health Care and Social Care for People with Mental Disorders in the Community.

16. Office of the National Assembly of Viet Nam. Consolidated Document No. 26/VBHN-VPQH, Law on Medical Examination and Treatment, dated February 26, 2026.

17. Ministry of Health of Viet Nam. Circular No. 32/2023/TT-BYT, detailing selected provisions of the Law on Medical Examination and Treatment, including professional scope for clinical psychology, as amended.

18. Ministry of Health of Viet Nam. Circular No. 25/2026/TT-BYT, dated June 30, 2026, amending selected provisions of Circular No. 32/2023/TT-BYT and other Ministry of Health regulations, effective August 15, 2026.

This article is intended for professional education and general information. It does not provide individualized mental health assessment, diagnosis, psychotherapy or medical treatment. Everyday stress can often be supported through healthy behaviors, practical coping strategies, social support and evidence-based self-help, but persistent or worsening distress, significant functional impairment or symptoms suggesting a mental health condition may require formal clinical assessment. Suicidal or serious self-harm risk, psychosis, severe agitation, acute confusion, inability to maintain basic safety or other urgent mental health concerns require timely professional evaluation and, when necessary, emergency care. General mental health education and stress-management support should not automatically be equated with clinical psychological treatment, but clinical assessment, diagnosis, psychological treatment, prescribing and other regulated healthcare activities must remain within the practitioner's training, competence, license and legally authorized professional scope in Viet Nam. Lifestyle Medicine, health coaching, mindfulness or other international education or certification does not by itself authorize regulated mental health practice in Viet Nam.

Privacy Policy and Personal Data Protection Notice

Terms and Conditions

VLMA is operated by Vietnam Lifestyle Medicine Alliance Company Limited, Enterprise Registration Number 0318902666.

VLMA is a Sister Organization of the Lifestyle Medicine Global Alliance and a Member Organization of the Planetary Health Alliance.

VLMA is not a medical service provider and does not issue medical licenses or IBLM certification.